آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,304 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,405 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,929,799 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,098,225 |
نقد و بررسی دیدگاه های نسبی گرا در شناخت «قضایای تحلیلی» و «قضایای ترکیبی» | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی آیین حکمت | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 6، تابستان 93 - مسلسل 20، شهریور 1393، صفحه 7-28 اصل مقاله (496.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| احمد ابوترابی | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 17 مهر 1393، تاریخ بازنگری: 04 اردیبهشت 1394، تاریخ پذیرش: 02 آذر 1393 | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Critical Survey of Relativistic Views in Knowledge of “Analytic” and “Synthetic” Propositions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ahmad AboTorabi | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the most controversial problems in western epistemology is the division of propositions into analytic and synthetic. This division drew the attention of many proponents and opponents and faced many objections. One the most important objections which if valid enough, can destroy the basis of this division and resulting epistemological consequences is the of relativity of both analytic as well as synthetic propositions. Since this objection can somewhat impact similar propositions in Islamic tradition of logic and philosophy, it is worth discussing with especial importance. The claim of relativity of analytic and synthetic propositions has been variously formulated by Oberheart, Mass, Bent, Luise, Wiseman and Smith. This article is to first explain these statements of the problem and then to give due responses to it and finally concluded that on the basis of valid epistemological principles analytic and synthetic propositions are relative. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| analytic proposition, synthetic proposition, epistemic relativism, epistemic absolutism, Proposition, statement, predicate | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,061 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 571 |
||