آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,388 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,317 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,016,296 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,718,222 |
Research Article On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell | ||
| Theosophia Islamica | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 1، شماره 1، فروردین 2021، صفحه 127-139 اصل مقاله (140.91 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2021.60383.1008 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Farzad Sharifzadeh* | ||
| Department of Islamic philosophy, Faculty of theology, Ferdowsi university, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 اسفند 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 08 اردیبهشت 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 اردیبهشت 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| One of the main problems for the doctrine of the traditional view of hell is Proportionality objection. It claims that eternal punishments for finite crimes of human beings cause undue harm and therefore are incompatible with divine justice. The proportionality principle states that the degree of punishment that a person justly merits must be proportionate to the level of his wrongdoing. One of the common ways to respond to this objection is rejecting the retributive nature of hell. Morteza Motahhari denied retributivism by distinguishing between the criminal system of the world and hereafter. He believed punishments in hell are identical to human deeds and they are nothing more than spiritual aspect of them. Regarding this view which is called 'Self-imposed punishments', God is not the punisher of the sinners, and the residents of hell suffer from their sinful actions. This paper begins with examining Motahhari's metaphysical theory of punishment as a theodicy of hell. Then I will discuss a modal argument against his theory. I shall argue there is not a necessary correlation between crimes and punishments. My conclusion is that Motahhari's theodicy would be undermined God's moral perfection either therefore it does not get God off the moral hook. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Hell؛ Theodicy؛ Divine justice؛ Punishment؛ Motahhari | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Research Article On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the main problems for the doctrine of the traditional view of hell is Proportionality objection. It claims that eternal punishments for finite crimes of human beings cause undue harm and therefore are incompatible with divine justice. The proportionality principle states that the degree of punishment that a person justly merits must be proportionate to the level of his wrongdoing. One of the common ways to respond to this objection is rejecting the retributive nature of hell. Morteza Motahhari denied retributivism by distinguishing between the criminal system of the world and hereafter. He believed punishments in hell are identical to human deeds and they are nothing more than spiritual aspect of them. Regarding this view which is called 'Self-imposed punishments', God is not the punisher of the sinners, and the residents of hell suffer from their sinful actions. This paper begins with examining Motahhari's metaphysical theory of punishment as a theodicy of hell. Then I will discuss a modal argument against his theory. I shall argue there is not a necessary correlation between crimes and punishments. My conclusion is that Motahhari's theodicy would be undermined God's moral perfection either therefore it does not get God off the moral hook. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Hell, Theodicy, Divine justice, Punishment, Motahhari | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Clark,K. J. (2001). God is Great,GodisGood:Medieval Conceptions of Divine Goodness and the Problem of Hell. Religious Studies,37(1), pp. 15-31. doi:10.1017/S0034412500005461 Kershnar, S. (2005). The Injustice of Hell. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 58(2), pp. 103-123. Kvanvig, J. L. (1993). The Problem of Hell. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lewis, D. (2007). Divine Evil. In Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life (L.M. Antony, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Motahhari, M. (2004). Divine Justice (S.H.Abidi, M.Alidina& Sh. AliMirza, Trans.).Qom: International Institute forIslamic Studies. Motahhari, M. (1985). Eternal Life (Life After Death) (M. Sohrabi & Z. Kasraian, Trans). Tehran: Islamic Propagation Organization. Plantinga, A. (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Seymour, C. (2000). A Theodicy of Hell. Netherlands: Springer. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 155 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 131 |
||