آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,477 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,334 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,303,171 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,413,651 |
***Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles | ||
| Theosophia Islamica | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 24 اسفند 1400 | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2022.61070.1017 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Muhammad Legenhausen* | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 10 خرداد 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 دی 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Charles Taliaferro’s “Philosophy of Mind and the Christian” begins with a loaded question: “Are we thoroughly physical beings or do we contain some nonphysical part, something we may call a soul, spirit, or mind?” The question presents us with a false dilemma, for there is also the possibility that we are neither merely material beings, nor do we contain a soul as a nonphysical part of us. Taliaferro follows this with a list of other questions pertaining to the philosophy of mind and asks whether Christians should give answers to these sorts of questions that differ from non-Christian colleagues. It seems odd to divide colleagues on the basis of Christianity with regard to these questions, for it means that if the Christian colleagues do have a particular take on these issues, it will be different from that of non-Christian theistic colleagues. Perhaps, however, Taliaferro’s department consists only of Christians and atheists. Even in this case, however, Taliaferro seems to think that there will be a uniformity in Christian thought that seems rather doubtful. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Christians؛ Muslims؛ Dualists؛ Interaction؛ Individuation | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| ***Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Charles Taliaferro’s “Philosophy of Mind and the Christian” begins with a loaded question: “Are we thoroughly physical beings or do we contain some nonphysical part, something we may call a soul, spirit, or mind?” The question presents us with a false dilemma, for there is also the possibility that we are neither merely material beings, nor do we contain a soul as a nonphysical part of us. Taliaferro follows this with a list of other questions pertaining to the philosophy of mind and asks whether Christians should give answers to these sorts of questions that differ from non-Christian colleagues. It seems odd to divide colleagues on the basis of Christianity with regard to these questions, for it means that if the Christian colleagues do have a particular take on these issues, it will be different from that of non-Christian theistic colleagues. Perhaps, however, Taliaferro’s department consists only of Christians and atheists. Even in this case, however, Taliaferro seems to think that there will be a uniformity in Christian thought that seems rather doubtful. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Christians, Muslims, Dualists, Interaction, Individuation | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 85 |
||