آمار

تعداد نشریات54
تعداد شماره‌ها2,473
تعداد مقالات35,286
تعداد مشاهده مقاله14,156,169
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,351,488
Taghavi Baghan, Maliheh, Akbari, Omid, Yazdani, Mohammad. (1403). An Examination of Lexical Coherence in Three English Translations of Complementary Oppositions in Surah Al-An'aam. اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, 2(2), -. doi: 10.22081/ttais.2025.70251.1043
Maliheh Taghavi Baghan; Omid Akbari; Mohammad Yazdani. "An Examination of Lexical Coherence in Three English Translations of Complementary Oppositions in Surah Al-An'aam". اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, 2, 2, 1403, -. doi: 10.22081/ttais.2025.70251.1043
Taghavi Baghan, Maliheh, Akbari, Omid, Yazdani, Mohammad. (1403). 'An Examination of Lexical Coherence in Three English Translations of Complementary Oppositions in Surah Al-An'aam', اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, 2(2), pp. -. doi: 10.22081/ttais.2025.70251.1043
Taghavi Baghan, Maliheh, Akbari, Omid, Yazdani, Mohammad. An Examination of Lexical Coherence in Three English Translations of Complementary Oppositions in Surah Al-An'aam. اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, 1403; 2(2): -. doi: 10.22081/ttais.2025.70251.1043

An Examination of Lexical Coherence in Three English Translations of Complementary Oppositions in Surah Al-An'aam

International Journal of Textual and Translation Analysis in Islamic Studies
مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6، تیر 2024
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/ttais.2025.70251.1043
نویسندگان
Maliheh Taghavi Baghan1؛ Omid Akbari2؛ Mohammad Yazdani* 2
1Translation Department - Imam Reza International University - Rezvan College - Mashhad - Iran
2Department of English Language, Imam Reza International University, Holy Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 21 آبان 1403،  تاریخ بازنگری: 21 بهمن 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 21 اسفند 1403 
چکیده
The present research was an attempt aimed at the investigation of whether or not complementary oppositions (COs) in the Glorious Qur'an have been translated accurately from Arabic into English. The theoretical framework was grounded in Halliday and Hassan's theory of lexical cohesion (1976), focusing on lexical cohesive devices in the three selected translations of Cos in Surah al-An'aam. Cos have been defined as paired semantic oppositions, where the negation of one reinforces the other. This qualitative study employed an analytical-documentary method to assess the translations. Translators often encounter challenges with various aspects, including collocations in translation, striving to maintain both meaning and form. The selected theoretical framework of Halliday and Hassan (1976) focused on lexical cohesive devices, including repetition, collocations, and sense relations. The study aimed primarily to examine the lexical coherence of those selected translations and to analyze the lexical relationships between their English CO equivalents, serving as essential lexical cohesive devices. The study utilized Arabic CO examples extracted from Seyyedi and Baghojary (2020) and their corresponding English translations by Arberry (1955), Pickthall (1930), and Qaraa'i (2005), extracted from Tanzil Qur'an Navigator (www.tanzil.net). The findings indicated that Arberry's translation, among others, exhibits superior lexical coherence due to its alignment with the Qur'anic style and the frequent use of collocations and contrasting repetition.
کلیدواژه‌ها
al-An’aam؛ the Glorious Qur'an Translation؛ Complementary Opposition (CO)؛ Lexical Coherence
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 25


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب