آمار

تعداد نشریات54
تعداد شماره‌ها2,522
تعداد مقالات35,774
تعداد مشاهده مقاله15,183,057
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,871,390
Abbaszadeh, Mahdi. (1401). Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives. اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, (), 7-44. doi: 10.22081/jti.2023.67808.1048
Mahdi Abbaszadeh. "Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives". اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, , , 1401, 7-44. doi: 10.22081/jti.2023.67808.1048
Abbaszadeh, Mahdi. (1401). 'Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives', اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, (), pp. 7-44. doi: 10.22081/jti.2023.67808.1048
Abbaszadeh, Mahdi. Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives. اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی, 1401; (): 7-44. doi: 10.22081/jti.2023.67808.1048

Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives

Theosophia Islamica
مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 اسفند 1401
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2023.67808.1048
نویسنده
Mahdi Abbaszadeh*
Faculty member at Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought
تاریخ دریافت: 22 آبان 1402،  تاریخ بازنگری: 28 اسفند 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 28 آذر 1402 
چکیده
This study employs a descriptive-analytical method and a critical comparative approach to examine, critique, and compare the proofs for the existence of God in Western and Islamic philosophy. The introduction clarifies the meaning of proof and distinguishes it from faith and reasoning. It then outlines key concepts necessary for a deeper understanding of the proofs for God’s existence, including the role of Western and Islamic philosophers in shaping these arguments, the distinction between horizontal and vertical proofs in Western and Islamic traditions, and the empiricist and rationalist approaches to these arguments in both intellectual traditions. Following this foundation, the article systematically analyzes four categories of arguments for God's existence: ontological, cosmological, teleological (design), and moral arguments, as presented by Western thinkers. These arguments are then examined and critiqued based on the principles of Islamic philosophy. Throughout the discussion, the study highlights how misunderstandings or misinterpretations of key concepts and rational principles unique to Islamic philosophy—particularly in general and special metaphysics—have contributed to certain misapprehensions in the history of Western philosophy regarding proofs for God’s existence.
کلیدواژه‌ها
God؛ proof؛ existence؛ quiddity؛ necessity؛ contingency؛ emergence.‎
عنوان مقاله [English]
Revisiting the Proofs for the Existence of God: A Comparative ‎Study of Western and Islamic Perspectives
نویسندگان [English]
مهدی عباس‌زاده
عضو هیأت علمی پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی
مراجع
  1. Abbaszadeh, M. (2019). The epistemological system of Suhrawardi's Illuminationist Philosophy (3rd ed.). Tehran: Organization for Research and Publishing of the Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
  2. Abbaszadeh, M. (2023). The epistemological system of Farabi (First ed.). Tehran: Organization for Research and Publishing of the Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
  3. Ayatollahy, H. (2010). The ontological or necessary being argument. In A. Rashad (Ed.), Sharīʿat-i khirad: a commemorative collection for Allama Mohammad-Taqi Jafari (2nd ed., pp. 441–453). Tehran: Organization for Research and Publishing of the Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
  4. Ayatollahy, H. (n.d.). Evaluation of the proofs for the existence of God in Western and Islamic thought. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu. [In Persian]
  5. Ayatollahy, H., & Shorvarzi, H. (2014). The Fine-Tuning Argument: Analyzing the Views of Sober and Its Defenders. Journal of Philosophical Inquiry in Religion, 3(2), 73–88. [In Persian]
  6. Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy (J. Cottingham, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Geisler, N. (2005). Philosophy of Religion (H. Ayatollahy, Trans.). Tehran: Hekmat Publishing.
  8. Haeri Yazdi, M. (2005). Investigations into theoretical reason (4th ed.). Tehran: Iranian Research Institute of Philosophy. [In Persian]
  9. Hume, D. (2013). Dialogues concerning natural religion. New York: Start Publishing LLC.
  10. Ibn Sīnā. (1983). Al-Shifāʾ (Theology) (Saeed Zayed, Ed.). Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Library. [In Arabic]
  11. Ibn Sīnā. (1996). Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (First ed.). Qom: Al-Balagha Publishing. [In Arabic]
  12. Javadi Amoli, A. (1995). Explanation of the proofs for God's existence (First ed.). Qom: Esra Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  13. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans. & Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Khansari, M. (1992). Formal logic (Vol. 2, 14th ed.). Tehran: Agah Publishing. [In Persian]
  15. Motahari, M. (2007). Footnotes on "The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism" (Vol. 5, 11th ed.). Tehran: Sadra Publishing.
  16. Mullā Ṣadrā (Ṣadr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm Shīrāzī). (1981). Al-Ḥikmat al-Mutaʿāliya fī al-asfār al-ʿaqliyyat al-arbaʿa (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath.
  17. Mullā Ṣadrā (Ṣadr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm Shīrāzī). (1981). Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbiyya fī al-manāhij al-sulūkiyya (2nd ed.). Mashhad: University Publishing Center.
  18. Naghibzadeh, M. A. (1995). Kant’s philosophy: awakening from dogmatic slumber. Tehran: Agah Publishing.
  19. Peterson, M., Hasker, W., Reichenbach, B., & Basinger, D. (1997). Reason and Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (A. Naraghi & E. Soltani, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e Now Publishing. [In Persian]
  20. Russell, B. (2009). The basic writings of Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge.
  21. Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. H. (2003). Nihāyat al-ḥikma (A. Zarei Sabzevari, Ed., 18th ed.). Qom: Islamic Publishing Office.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 39
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 33


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب