آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,627 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,187 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,811,977 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,058,168 |
دامنه رو به گسترش «بشر»: موضوعات نوظهور حقوق بشر در حقوق معاصر | ||
| فلسفه حقوق | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 1، فروردین 1404، صفحه 122-105 اصل مقاله (2.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/phlq.2025.72022.1123 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیما حاتمی* 1؛ هلن اولیایینیا* 2 | ||
| 1گروه حقوق بینالملل عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 10 خرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 31 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 خرداد 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| درک سنتی انسانمحور از حقوق بشر، در گفتمان حقوقی معاصر، دستخوش ارزیابی مجدد عمیقی است. اگرچه از نظر تاریخی بر انسانِ منفرد متمرکز بوده است، اما تحولات اخیر در حقوق بینالملل و منطقهای حقوق بشر، روندی نوپا اما قابل توجه را به سمت گسترش حقوق و حمایتها به موجودات غیرانسانی نشان میدهد. این مقاله به بررسی مبانی حقوقی و پیامدهای به رسمیت شناختن «حقوق طبیعت» و بررسی ابعاد حقوق بشری هوش مصنوعی میپردازد و استدلال میکند که این موضوعات نوظهور، مفاهیم بنیادی در حقوق بشر را به چالش کشیده و تغییر شکل میدهند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بشر؛ فقه؛ حقوق بشر؛ اعلامیه جهانی حقوق بشر؛ حق | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Expanding Ambit of "Human": Emerging Human Rights Subjects in Contemporary Jurisprudence | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sima Hatami1؛ Helen Ouliaeinia2 | ||
| 1Department of Public International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English language and literature, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract: The traditional anthropocentric understanding of human rights is undergoing a profound re-evaluation in contemporary legal discourse. While historically focused on the individual human being, recent developments in international and regional human rights law reveal a nascent yet significant trend towards extending rights and protections to non-human entities. This article examines the legal basis and implications of recognizing "rights of nature" and considering the human rights dimensions of artificial intelligence, arguing that these emerging subjects challenge and reshape foundational concepts within human rights law. Abstract: The traditional anthropocentric understanding of human rights is undergoing a profound re-evaluation in contemporary legal discourse. While historically focused on the individual human being, recent developments in international and regional human rights law reveal a nascent yet significant trend towards extending rights and protections to non-human entities. This article examines the legal basis and implications of recognizing "rights of nature" and considering the human rights dimensions of artificial intelligence, arguing that these emerging subjects challenge and reshape foundational concepts within human rights law. Abstract: The traditional anthropocentric understanding of human rights is undergoing a profound re-evaluation in contemporary legal discourse. While historically focused on the individual human being, recent developments in international and regional human rights law reveal a nascent yet significant trend towards extending rights and protections to non-human entities. This article examines the legal basis and implications of recognizing "rights of nature" and considering the human rights dimensions of artificial intelligence, arguing that these emerging subjects challenge and reshape foundational concepts within human rights law. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Human, artificial intelligence perfection Human, philosophy, international law, artificial intelligence perfection | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Environmental Rights and Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Ser. A No. 23, Nov. 15, 2017.
Alsenoy, T.V. (2020). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Freedom of Expression: Content Moderation, Algorithmic Curation and the Rise of Deepfakes. Council of Europe, DG I – Human Rights and Rule of Law.
Automated Criminal Justice: The Use of Algorithms in Risk Assessment, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) (2019). URL= https://www.aclu.org/report/automated-criminal-justice-use-algorithms-risk-assessment Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Phenotypic and Demographic Bias in Commercial Gender Classification. Proc. of Machine Learning Research.
Case No. 11121-2011-0010, Provincial Court of Justice of Loja, Ecuador (2011).
Chesney, R. & Citron, D. (2019). Deepfakes and the New Disinformation War. Cal. L. Rev., no. 1753.
Christopher, D. (1972). Stone, Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review.
Citron, D. & Pasquale, F. (2014). The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions. Wash. L. Rev., no. 1.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador, arts. 71-74.
Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec (2020)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems (2020). URL=https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016809e5309
Council of Europe, Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing and Artificial Intelligence (2020), para. 6. URL= https://rm.coe.int/study-human-rights-dimensions-of-automated-data-processing-and-arti/16809e5309 Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer.
Edwards, L. & Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'Right to an Explanation' Is Probably Not the Right Answer to Problems of Algorithmic Discrimination. Intl. Data Privacy Law, no. 1.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.
European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), COM (2021) 206 final (2021) [hereinafter EU AI Act].
European Parliament Resolution on Artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by police and judicial authorities in criminal matters, (2021/2012(INI).
Goodman, B. & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making are stronger than they look. 34th Int'l Conf. on Mach. Learning, JMLR W&, CP 70.
Kaminski, M.E. (2016). The Right to Explanation in EU Data Protection Law. S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J., no.1.
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
Ley de Derechos de la Madre Tierra (Law No. 071, 2010), Bolivia.
Ley Marco de la Madre Tierra y Desarrollo Integral para Vivir Bien (Law No. 300, 2012), Bolivia.
Margil, M. & Greene, N. (2019). The Rights of Nature: A Global Movement. In: Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and the Environment. S. Turner & J. Razzaque (eds.).
O'Donnell, E.L. & Talbot-Jones, J. (2019). The Emergence of Legal Rights for Rivers. WIREs Water.
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), The right to privacy in the digital age, A/HRC/39/29 (2018).
OHCHR, Artificial intelligence and human rights: A guide for judicial actors (2022). URL= https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/tools-and-resources/artificial-intelligence-and-human-rights-guide-judicial-actors
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
Sentencia No. 234-18-SEP-CC, Constitutional Court of Ecuador, Feb. 11, 2021 (Los Cedros Protected Forest).
Sentencia STC4360-2018, Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia, Apr. 5, 2018 (Colombian Amazon Case).
Sentencia T-622/16, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Nov. 10, 2016 (Atrato River Case).
Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (N.Z.).
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.
UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 41 C/Res. 31 (2021). URL=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378036
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810 at 71 (1948) [hereinafter UDHR].
Veale, M. & Edwards, L. (2020). Fairness and Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems: A European Perspective. Intl. J. Law & Info. Tech. no.16.
Zardini, M. (ed.) (2021). The Black Box of AI: The Challenges of Explaining Artificial Intelligence. Canadian Centre for Architecture.
Zubof, Sh. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 470 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 330 |
||