آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,515 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,710 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,987,114 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,757,965 |
Normative and Judicial Impact of Human Rights on Citizenship Rights | ||
| فلسفه حقوق | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 1، فروردین 1404، صفحه 138-123 اصل مقاله (1.99 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/phlq.2025.77886 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Mohammad Hosseini* | ||
| Department of Philosophy of Law, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 31 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 31 تیر 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Human rights, grounded in the protection of human dignity, have a normative nature transformed the traditional structure of citizenship rights. This transformation has extended citizenship rights into the realm of international law. Consequently, citizenship rights and their associated concepts are now defined more by universal human rights laws than by the national interests of states. This process suggests that human rights serve as a primary principle, governing over citizenship rights. It also implies that, through developments in the theoretical foundations of citizenship, there may be a need to revise state constitutions or demand narrow or broad interpretations of constitutional laws. The procedures of the International Court of Justice, including its efforts to redefine nationality and citizenship and to identify the customary law of international law in terms of human rights requirements, reflect this transformation. Accordingly, the traditional definitions of citizenship and related concepts, such as nationality, are evolving, highlighting the need for new interpretations. A reinterpretation of citizenship rights, informed by human rights values, suggests a shift in the legal principles that govern the traditional perspective on citizenship. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Citizenship rights؛ Citizenship؛ State Affiliation؛ Nationality؛ Human rights | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Normative and Judicial Impact of Human Rights on Citizenship Rights | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Hosseini | ||
| Department of Philosophy of Law, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Human rights, grounded in the protection of human dignity, have a normative nature transformed the traditional structure of citizenship rights. This transformation has extended citizenship rights into the realm of international law. Consequently, citizenship rights and their associated concepts are now defined more by universal human rights laws than by the national interests of states. This process suggests that human rights serve as a primary principle, governing over citizenship rights. It also implies that, through developments in the theoretical foundations of citizenship, there may be a need to revise state constitutions or demand narrow or broad interpretations of constitutional laws. The procedures of the International Court of Justice, including its efforts to redefine nationality and citizenship and to identify the customary law of international law in terms of human rights requirements, reflect this transformation. Accordingly, the traditional definitions of citizenship and related concepts, such as nationality, are evolving, highlighting the need for new interpretations. A reinterpretation of citizenship rights, informed by human rights values, suggests a shift in the legal principles that govern the traditional perspective on citizenship. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Citizenship rights, Citizenship, State Affiliation, Nationality, Human rights | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aldrich, G.H. (2000). The laws of war on land. American Journal of International Law, 94(1), p. 42-63.
Arfania, B. (1991). Private international law. Tehran: Agah Publications.
Blackwell, A.H. (2008). The Essential Law Dictionary. Cairo: Sphinx Publishing. [in persian] Bordbar, M.H. (2005). Jurisdiction in international courts of justice. Tehran: Qoqnoos. [in persian]
Den Hartogh, G. (1998). A conventionalist theory of obligation. Law and Philosophy, no. 17, p. 351-376.
Edwards, A. & Van Waas, L. (eds.) (2014). Nationality and statelessness under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fadavi, S. (2003). An examination of citizenship status in Iranian law. Kanun, no. 40, p. 29-46. [in persian]
Fellmeth, A.X. & Horwitz, M. (2009). Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hart Herbert L. (1968). Law, Liberty, and Morality. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
ICJ, Report. (1962). International Court of Justice Reports, South West Africa Case.
ICJ, Report. (1996). International Court of Justice Reports.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Advisory Opinion OC-4/84 (19 January 1984). Inter-American Court of Human Rights Reports, Series A No. 4.
Kadkhodaee, A.A. & Zarneshan, Sh. (2013). Evolution of the Approach of International Judicial Practice in the Process of Recognition of Rules of Customary International Law. Private law studies quarterly, 43(1), p. 173-192. [in persian]
Khalilian, S.K. (2003). Legal cases of Iran and the US in Permanent Court of Arbitration (The Hague). Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar. [in persian]
Kim, E-J.K. (2015). Acceptability, Impartiality, and Peremptory Norms of General International Law. Law and Philosophy, 34(6), p. 661-697.
Lehning, P.B. & Weale, A. (1997). Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe. In: Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe, edited by P. Lehning & A. Weale, p. 2-13. London: Routledge Publishing.
Nida-Rümelin, J. (1997). Structural rationality, democratic citizenship and the new Europe. In: Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe, edited by P. Lehning & A. Weale, p. 33-47. London: Routledge Publishing.
Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ). Series B: Advisory Opinions, No. 4.
Ranjbarian, A.H. (2005). The position of the no-torture rule in contemporary international law. Law and political science, no. 70, p. 147-184. [in persian]
Report of the Secretary-General on Arbitrary Deprivation of Nationality (2009). United Nations General Assembly Report.
Roberts, A.E. (2001). Traditional and modern approaches to customary international law: a reconciliation. American Journal of international law, 95(4), p. 757-791.
Spiro, P.J. (2010). Dual citizenship as human right. International journal of constitutional law, 8(1), p. 111-130.
Tasioulas, J. (2012). Human Rights. In: The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by A. Marmor, p. 348-363. London: Routledge Publishing.
Torreli, M. (1993). La dimension humanitaire de la securite international, La developpement du role du Conseil de securite, R-J Dupuy (dir. Publ), Academie de droit international. Drodrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (2015). New York: UN Publishing. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 96 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 61 |
||