آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,556 |
| تعداد مقالات | 36,213 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,307,682 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,382,194 |
Strategies of Political Justice in Imam Khomeini’s Thought | ||
| Islamic Political Studies | ||
| دوره 7، شماره 1، فروردین 2025، صفحه 211-232 اصل مقاله (1.28 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jips.2025.72415.1087 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| َAmir Heydari Khoyi1؛ Seyed Kazem Seyed Bagheri* 2؛ Hossein Rezapour3 | ||
| 1Department of Political Science, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Politics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 30 تیر 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 شهریور 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 شهریور 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The primary aim of this study is to examine the strategies of political justice in the thought of Imam Khomeini and to analyze how this concept is articulated as a central signifier in his political discourse. Justice occupies a central position in his thought, to the extent that other political concepts and values derive their meaning in relation to it. Imam Khomeini views justice not merely as a theoretical concept, but as a foundational principle for organizing both society and the Islamic state. From his perspective, political justice is a continuum of meanings within a monotheistic system, where the implementation of divine laws is seen as essential, with justice at its core. The central question of this research is: What are the strategies of political justice in Imam Khomeini’s thought, and how are these strategies articulated within his intellectual framework? This question seeks to uncover how Imam Khomeini, from theological and jurisprudential standpoints, offers practical pathways for realizing justice in an Islamic political system. The methodology of this research is based on discourse analysis. Using this method, Imam Khomeini’s texts, speeches, and writings are examined to trace how the semantic network of justice takes shape and how it connects with other key signifiers in his discourse. This analysis aims to identify the semantic markers related to political justice and determine how they are structured within his monotheistic worldview. The study’s key findings reveal that political justice in Imam Khomeini’s thought is articulated through three overarching strategies: (1) Structural Strategy: This strategy is reflected in the establishment of the Islamic Republic and emphasizes the creation of a political structure centered on the implementation of divine law and the realization of justice. Within this framework, wilāyat-i faqīh (guardianship of the jurist) and the sovereignty of divine law are presented as the main instruments for achieving structural justice. (2) Distributive Strategy: This approach emphasizes equal access for all to political and social opportunities, broad political participation, and meritocracy. Imam Khomeini holds that individuals should attain political and social positions based on competence and merit, free from discrimination. (3) Restorative Strategy: This strategy focuses on addressing and reducing social and political inequalities. It includes raising political awareness, eliminating deprivation, and supporting the oppressed or the underprivileged (mustaḍʿafīn) as fundamental measures for healing societal injustices. The study concludes that in Imam Khomeini’s thought, political justice is not merely an ideal but a criterion for assessing the legitimacy of the political system. It serves as a guiding principle for all social and political transformations, as well as a foundation for governance and policymaking. By placing justice at the heart of his political discourse, Imam Khomeini presents a model in which the structure of power, distribution of resources, and redress of social harms must all serve the realization of divine justice—thus enabling all citizens to access political rights and human dignity. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Strategies؛ political justice؛ political thought؛ Imam Khomeini | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The Holy Quran.
Nahj al-Balagha.
Akhavan Kazemi, B. (2012). Oversight in the Islamic order with an emphasis on the views of Imam Khomeini. Qom: Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
Baratalipour, M. (2015). Modeling social justice policy in post-revolutionary Iran: A response to the paradox of two ontological and normative narratives. Islamic Politics Research, 3(8), pp. 33–55. [In Persian]
Bashirieh, H. (1996). The history of political thought in the twentieth century: The political philosophy of John Rawls. Political-Economic Information, 11(109–110), pp. 36–43. [In Persian] Bashirieh, H. (2009). Political sociology (17th ed.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Behroozlak, G. R. (2008). Political Islam and globalization. Strategic Studies, no. 14, pp. 145–171. [In Persian]
Doroudi, M. (2017). Meritocracy from an Islamic perspective. Qom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute. [In Persian]
Ebtekari, M. H. (2017). A study of theory, method, application, and discourse analysis. Research Approaches in Social Sciences, 3(10), pp. 64–86. [In Persian]
Elahi Khorasani, A. (2013). The jurisprudential rule of justice. Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation of Astan Quds Razavi. [In Persian]
Fattahi, H. (2010). Support diplomacy in international relations. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. [In Persian]
Fayḍ Kāshānī, M. M. (2016). Tafsīr Ṣāfī (Vol. 5). Translated by A. Aghighi Bakhshayeshi. Tehran: Navid Islam Publishing. [In Persian]
Ghazizadeh, K. (2006). Religious democracy (viewpoints): Quranic Sciences Research, Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Heidari Khoei, A. (2023). Political schools and terminology (5th ed.). Isfahan: Khatam-e Sabz Publications. [In Persian]
Heidari Khoei, A., Seyed-Bagheri, S. K. & Rezapour, H. (2022). Principles of political justice in the thought of Imam Khomeini and John Rawls. Islamic Politics Research, 10(22), pp. 257–281. [In Persian]
Jamalzadeh, N. (2008). Socio-political justice in three approaches: Jurisprudential, philosophical, and sociological. Political Science, 4(2), pp. 5–36. [In Persian]
Jamshidi, M. H. (2001). The concept of justice in the political thought of Imam Khomeini. Ḥuḍūr, no. 36. [In Persian]
Jamshidi, M. H., & Doroudi, M. (2010). The concept and indicators of political justice in Imam Khomeini’s political discourse (with emphasis on Rawls’s theory of political justice). Islamic Revolution Studies, 7(22), pp. 179–205. [In Persian]
Javadi Amoli, A. (2010). Wilāyat-i faqīh: The guardianship of justice and jurisprudence (20th ed.). Tehran: Esra Publishing. [In Persian]
Khomeini, S. R. A. (1994). Sharḥ-i chihil ḥadīth. Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Khomeini, S. R. A. (1998). Sharḥ-i ḥadīth-i junūd-i ʿaql va jahl. Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Khomeini, S. R. A. (1999). Ṣaḥīfa-yi Imam (Vols. 2–9, 14–21, 11). Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Khomeini, S. R. A. (2000). Kitāb al-Bayʿ (Vol. 2). Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Khomeini, S. R. A. (2005). Wilāyat-i faqīh. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Publishing. [In Persian] Mazloomi, N. (2012). A model for implementing strategic programs. Management Studies, no. 22, pp. 19–45. [In Persian]
Moghaddami, M. T. (2011). Laclau and Mouffe's discourse analysis theory and its critique. Cultural-Social Knowledge, 2(2), pp. 91–124. [In Persian]
Mousavi Lari, A. (1999). Political participation, parties, elections. Tehran: Safir Publishing. [In Persian]
Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Wiley.
Peters, Y. (2017). Political participation, diffused governance, and the transformation of democracy. Routledge.
Rahimi, M. R. (2011). Meritocracy and its strategies in the Islamic approach. Islam and Management Research Studies, 1(3), pp. 35–62. [In Persian]
Saberian, A. (2007). Political participation: Right or obligation. Journal of Jurisprudence and Civilization History, 3(12), pp. 141. [In Persian]
Sarkheil, B. (2011). The role of international supportive behavior in the thought of Imam Khomeini and its impact on advancing Iran's foreign policy. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. [In Persian]
Seyyed-Bagheri, S. K. (2013). Political justice strategies from the perspective of the Holy Qur'an. Transcendent Politics, 1(2), pp. 7–28. [In Persian]
Seyyed-Bagheri, S. K. (2018). The right to political participation and freedom with emphasis on the Holy Qur'an. Islamic Politics Research, 6(14), pp. 41–65. [In Persian]
Seyyed-Bagheri, S. K. (2021). Political justice from the perspective of the Holy Quran (3rd ed.). Tehran: Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
Tajik, M. R. (1998). Otherness, identity, and revolution: The formation of revolutionary discourse in Iran. Matin, no. 1, pp. 83–105. [In Persian]
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 234 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 93 |
||