| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,641 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,364 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,591,713 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,492,499 |
Governance in the Mirror of Metaphors: The Role of Language and Cognitive Mechanisms in Public Policy | ||
| Theosophia Islamica | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 خرداد 1405 اصل مقاله (1.08 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2026.74777.1122 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Fatemeh Shafiei* | ||
| Postdoctoral Researcher of Cognitive Science, Institute for Humanities and Social Studies, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Thehran, Iran. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 31 اردیبهشت 1405، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 خرداد 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 10 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Traditional paradigms of public administration often rely on rational-actor models, assuming that policy formulation is a purely objective, logical process. This paper challenges that assumption by examining governance through the lens of Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Utilizing Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), this study argues that the foundational architecture of public policy is intrinsically metaphorical (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Metaphors are not mere rhetorical embellishments; rather, they constitute the cognitive infrastructure that dictates problem definition, constrains epistemological horizons, and limits the spectrum of viable policy solutions (Kövecses, 2010; Lakoff, 2004). By analyzing cross-cultural linguistic mappings, embodied cognition, and dominant policy frames, this paper explores how “Grand Metaphors” covertly structure macro-level political decision-making in domains such as environmental crisis management, macroeconomics, and international relations. Ultimately, the paper advocates for “metaphorical literacy” among policymakers, arguing that the deliberate reframing of governance paradigms—shifting from militaristic and control-based metaphors to ecological and systemic ones—is an essential prerequisite for sustainable public administration. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Conceptual Metaphor Theory؛ Public Policy؛ Cognitive Linguistics؛ Critical Discourse Analysis؛ Metaphorical Literacy؛ Framing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans., 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beer, F. A., & De Landtsheer, C. (Eds.). (2004). Metaphorical world politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris‑Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), pp. 563–581.
Charteris‑Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp. 51-58.Ghassemzadeh, H. (2013). Metaphor and Cognition. Tehran: Arjmand publication. [In Persian].
Ghassemzadeh, H. (2019). An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Metaphor. Tehran. Arjmand pub. [In Persian].
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley.
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1651)
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), pp. 341-350.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. Viking.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics (2nd ed.). University of Wisconsin Press.
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper & Row.
Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), pp. 41–56.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), pp. 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), pp. 1-39.
Quintilian. (1920). Institutio oratoria (H. E. Butler, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published ca. 95 CE).
Rein, M., Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy 9, pp. 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832235.
Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. University of Texas Press.
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Semino, E. (2021). “Not soldiers but fire-fighters”: Metaphors and COVID-19. Health Communication, 36(1), pp. 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10410236.2020.1844989
Shafiei, F., & Ghassemzadeh, H. (2021). Metaphors’ effect on off-line cognition: A preliminary study based on a reaction time task. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(11), pp. 139–146. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.11.15
Shiller, R. J. (2019). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. Wiley.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2021). Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105567.
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLOS ONE, 15(9), e0240010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548
Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 30 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7 |
||