آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,667 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,660 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,086,941 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,416,834 |
Futures Studies of Social Narratives in Cognitive Governance: The Embodied Representation of Narratives in the Nexus of Language, Memory, and Social Policy | ||
| Theosophia Islamica | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 12، مهر 2026، صفحه 1-44 اصل مقاله (1.2 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2026.74805.1128 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mehri Firoozalizadeh* 1؛ Mohammad-Hadi Ghasemi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Tolou-e-Mehr University, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author). | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Futures Studies, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 03 خرداد 1405، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 خرداد 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 12 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Narrative is not merely a tool for transmitting experience; rather, it constitutes a cognitive, neurocognitive, social, and cultural mechanism through which human beings construct meaning from their world, identity, and embodied experiences. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach and employing a meta-synthesis methodology, the present study examines the relationship among social narratives, episodic memory, mental spaces, embodied meaning, and cognitive governance, while also analyzing the consequences of the unheard narratives of people in forming social depression. The findings demonstrate that narratives emerge from the interaction of neural networks, episodic memory, and conceptualization processes. During the hearing or retelling of narratives, sensory-motor, visual, parietal, and temporal areas of the brain are activated. From this perspective, narrative is not merely the linguistic representation of experience, but rather the neural and mental reconstruction of embodied reality. The article further argues that the gap between the grand narratives of governance and the counter narratives of ordinary people leads to feelings of being unheard, socially forgotten, and deprived of meaning and belonging. Such conditions may foster collective depression, social distrust, and the expansion of cognitive fragmentation within society. Under these circumstances, cognitive governance requires the capacity to hear, analyze, and represent social narratives within policymaking processes. The study subsequently adopts a futures-oriented perspective to investigate emerging trends in the relationship among technology, media, narrative, and governance. The results indicate that, with the expansion of artificial intelligence, algorithmic media, virtual reality, and cognitive big data, narratives will become the primary arena for shaping social perception and governing the mind. Thus, societies lacking mechanisms for “hearing the narratives of the people” will face intensified cognitive polarization, erosion of social capital, crises of meaning, and increased collective psychological disorders. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Cognitive Governance؛ Futures Studies؛ Cognitive Narratives؛ Embodiment؛ Episodic Memory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Antweiler, K. (2024). Memory as a means of governmentality. Memory Studies, 17(2), pp. 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221150892
Azar, A. E. (2008). Persian literature in world literature. Tehran: Sokhan Publications. [In Persian]
Bamberg, M., & Andrews, M. (Eds.). (2004). considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), pp. 577–660.
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Benjamin, W. (1999). Experience and poverty. In M. W. Jennings, H. Eiland, & G. Smith (Eds.), Selected writings (Vol. 2, 1927–1934, R. Livingstone et al., Trans., pp. 731–736). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 1–16). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), pp. 1-21.
Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), pp. 594–628.
Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), pp. 1–18.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Feldman, J. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Figueroa-Grenett, C. (2024). Exploring collective memory in social psychology: The influence of social identity and the ideological role of memories. Ajayu, 22(1),pp. 255–278. https://doi.org/10.35319/ajayu.221255
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ghasemi, Mohammad Hadi and Sharahi, Ismaeil. (2025). Future scenarios of Iranian social capital in cyberspace. Quarterly Journal of Social Capital Management, 12 (2): pp. 129-145. [In Persian]
Grishakova, M., & Poulaki, M. (Eds.). (2019). Narrative complexity: Cognition, embodiment, evolution. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), pp. 4–21.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lopez, C., van Alphen, F., & Carmona, L. (2025). Narratives and collective memory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.copsyc.2025.102087.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). the postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), pp. 100–122.
Polak, F. (1973). The image of the future (E. Boulding, Trans. & Abr.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, pp. 169–192.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Berlin: Springer.
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. Boulder: Praeger.
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), pp. 989–999.
Thomsen, D. K., Fivush, R., Coman, A., Hirst, W., Luminet, O., & Pillemer, D. B. (2025). A framework for vicarious and collective memory, future projections and narrative identity. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4, pp. 292–305.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 381–403). Waltham: Academic Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 140 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 91 |
||