آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,666 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,655 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,965,153 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,342,220 |
Infanticide and the Question of Personhood: A Critique of the View of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva | ||
| Theosophia Islamica | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 6، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 12، مهر 2026، صفحه 1-24 اصل مقاله (1000.63 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jti.2026.74814.1131 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fatemeh Jamshidi1؛ Alireza Alebouyeh2 | ||
| 1PhD. student, Department of Philosophy and Theology (Imami Kalam), Faculty of Islamic Studies, University of Quran and Hadith, Qom, Iran (Responsible author). | ||
| 2. Assistant professor, Department of Moral Philosophy, Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Research Center, Qom, Iran. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 04 خرداد 1405، تاریخ بازنگری: 24 خرداد 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Infanticide is a fundamental issue in bioethics and the philosophy of law, one that depends on how “personhood” is defined and on the basis upon which the “right to life” is recognized. The importance of this issue lies in the fact that any redefinition of the concept of personhood may alter the scope of the right to life and the moral and legal protection granted to human beings. This article aims to examine and criticize the view of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva regarding the permissibility of infanticide. By distinguishing between a “biological human being” and a “moral person,” they argue that newborn infants, like fetuses, lack the characteristics necessary for personhood because they are neither capable of valuing their own existence nor capable of being harmed by being deprived of that existence. They therefore maintain that the reasons used to justify abortion may also be applied to newborn infants. Using an analytical-critical method, the present study examines the philosophical foundations and ethical consequences of this theory and analyzes the arguments for and against it. The findings indicate that the criterion of an “actual person” leads to the denial of the right to life to certain human beings, including infants and individuals with severe intellectual disabilities, and makes human dignity dependent on temporary mental capacities. Moreover, restricting the concept of harm to its conscious experience encounters serious logical and ethical objections. The study concludes that Giubilini and Minerva’s theory lacks sufficient coherence and cannot preserve the connection among equality, dignity, and the right to life. Recognizing the right to life on the basis of intrinsic dignity and membership in humanity therefore provides a more reasonable framework for addressing the issue of infanticide. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| personhood؛ infanticide؛ abortion؛ Giubilini؛ Minerva؛ human dignity؛ bioethics | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-bouyeh, A. (2019). Abortion from an ethical perspective. Tehran: The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT).
Beckwith, F. J. (2007). Defending life: A moral and legal case against abortion choice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97 80511804885
Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Camosy, C. (2013). Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: A brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), pp. 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100617
Finnis, J. (2013). Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), pp. 281–283. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/medethics-2012-101198
Fletcher, J. F. (1974). Four indicators of humanhood: The enquiry matures. The Hastings Center Report, 4(6), pp. 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560587
Giubilini, A., & Minerva, F. (2013). After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), 261–263. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
Kaczor, C. (2012). The ethics of abortion: Women’s rights, human life, and the question of justice. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 76(3), pp. 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2012.0021
Kaczor, C. (2018). A dubious defense of ‘after-birth abortion’: A reply to Räsänen. Bioethics, 32(2), pp. 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12413
Laing, J. A. (2013). Infanticide: A reply to Giubilini and Minerva. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), pp. 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100664
Manninen, B. A. (2013). Yes, the baby should live: A pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), pp. 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100656
Poor-Mohammadi, A. (2011). Personal identity in bioethics. Foundations of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 4(8), pp. 33–54.
Savulescu, J. (2002). The embryonic stem cell lottery and the cannibalization of human beings. Bioethics, 16(6), pp. 508–529. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-8519.00308
Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tooley, M. (1972). Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(1), pp. 37–65.
Warren, M. A. (1973). On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist, 57(1), pp. 43–61.
Warren, M. A. (1993). Abortion. In P. Singer (ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 303–314). Oxford:
Warren, M. A. (1997). Moral status: Obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00048408812343571 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 71 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 53 |
||