آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,632 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,262 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,015,632 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,211,000 |
An Examination of Patterns of Imam Ali’s Treatment of Civil Oppositions and Disobedience | ||
| Islamic Political Studies | ||
| دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 13، مهر 2025، صفحه 49-70 اصل مقاله (872.7 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jips.2025.78794 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fatemeh Enteshari* 1؛ Najmiye Alsadat Fazeli2؛ Rasūl Nowrūzī Fīrūz3 | ||
| 1PhD, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Feiz-e-Islam Higher Education Institute, Khomeyni Shahr, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 27 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آبان 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aims to explore the theoretical and practical dimensions of civil disobedience within the framework of Imam Ali’s governance. It seeks to derive a political, social, religious, and rational model from the approach of the Islamic government during the era of Imam Ali in addressing various forms of civil opposition and citizens’ protests. Civil disobedience during Imam Ali’s era can be categorized into groups such as critics, political opponents, rebels, and those who broke their allegiance (e.g., the Kharijites). The primary question of this research is: How and based on what ethical and legal principles, did Imam Ali address civil disobedience during his governance, and what model did he employ? The research hypothesis rests upon the idea that Imam Ali’s approach can be analyzed as a model of interactive and non-confrontational engagement with protest actions. This model is grounded in ethical, legal, and political principles, resulting in a spectrum of responses to civil disobedience (from critics to subversives). The study focuses on the conduct and governance methods of Imam Ali, aiming to uncover the latent capacities in his political discourse, behavior, and practices to address the contemporary needs of Islamic governance systems in managing civil protest actions. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing historical, jurisprudential, and hadith-based sources, particularly the Nahj al-Balagha. Data collection was conducted through library studies and analysis of Imam Ali’s statements and behaviors, employing a conceptual inference method to extract his behavioral model toward civil opposition. The findings indicate that Imam Ali successfully distinguished between reformist opponents and subversive adversaries, recognizing fundamental principles such as tolerance, human dignity, freedom of expression, and the right to advice, protest, and criticism for all citizens of the Islamic society. On one hand, with divine rationality and open-mindedness, he acknowledged the voice of dissent; on the other, as long as protesters’ actions did not pose a threatening or subversive challenge to the system, he preserved their place within the social and even political structures of governance, allowing them active and constructive participation. Based on the research findings and meticulous examination of reliable sources and analysis of Imam Ali’s conduct, his behavior can be described as an ethical, participatory, dialogue-oriented, and justice-centered model for addressing civil disobedience. This model not only strengthens the religious and rational legitimacy of governance but also plays a significant role in preventing social fragmentation, reducing political tensions, and maintaining national cohesion. The study suggests that civil disobedience, within the framework of Shiite rationality and Islamic theological principles, is not only acceptable but, in many cases, a constructive necessity for achieving justice, reformations, ensuring accountability of authorities, and fostering a space for political interaction and citizen participation toward societal progress. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| citizens’ rights؛ civil disobedience؛ Imam Ali’s governance؛ interactive model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The Holy Quran.
Nahj al-Balagha.
Āmidī, A. (1990). Ghurar al-ḥikam wa durar al-kalim. Qom: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya. [In Arabic] Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dashti, M. (2009). Tarjumi-yi Nahj al-Balāgha. Amīr al-Mu'minīn Research and Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
Hasanlou, N., & Javid, M. J. (2022). The relationship between civil disobedience and the rule of law in a religious government. Pajūhish-i ḥuqūq-i ʿumūmī, 24(75), pp. 117-148. [In Persian]
Ḥillī, Ḥ. (1995). Tadhkirat al-fuqahāʾ (Vol. 9). Beirut: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt li-Ihyāʾ al-Turāth. [In Arabic]
Ḥurr al-ʿĀmili, M. (1993). Tafṣīl wasā'il al-Shīʿa ilā taḥṣīl masā'il al-sharīʿa. Qom: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt li-ihyā' al-Turāth. [In Arabic]
Ḥurr al-ʿĀmili, M. (1993). Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa (Vol. 11). Qom: Āl al-Bayt. [In Arabic]
Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd, A. (1983). Sharḥ nahj al-balāgha (Vol. 12; M.A. Ibrahim, Ed.). Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabiyya. [In Arabic]
Ibn Athīr. (1965). Al-Kāmil fī al-tārīkh (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. [In Arabic]
Ibn Khaldūn, A. (1985). Al-Muqaddama (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
Ibn Muzāḥim, N. (1982). Waqʿa Ṣiffīn (2nd ed., A.M. Harūn, Ed.). Qom: Manshūrāt Maktabat al-Marʿashī al-Najafī. [In Arabic]
Kant, I. (2022). Falsafi-yi ḥuqūq (M. Sanei Darrebidi, Trans.). Tehran: Naqsh wa Nigār. [In Persian]
Majlisī, M. B. (1897). Bihār al-anwār (Vol. 75). Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya. [In Arabic]
Mohaghegh Damad, S. M., & Vesali, S. S. (2014). Nahj al-Balagha: A comprehensive perspective on citizens’ rights. Tehran: Strategic Development Center for Citizens’ Rights. [In Persian]
Motahari, M. (2010). Islam and the demands of the time. Tehran: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
Muḥaqqiq al-Ḥillī, A. (2006). Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (Vol. 4). Qom: Bunyād Maʿārif Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Muḥaqqiq al-Karakī, ʿA. (1988). Jāmiʿ al-maqāsid fī sharḥ al-qawāʿid (Vol. 4, 2nd ed.). Qom: Āl al-Bayt Institute. [In Arabic]
Narāqī, A. (1996). ʿAwāʾid al-ayyām fī bayān qawāʿid al-ahkām wa-muhimmāt masāʾil al-ḥalāl wa-l-ḥarām. Qom: Būstān-i Kitāb. [In Arabic]
Narāqī, M. M. (1996). ʿAwaʾid al-ayyām. Qom: Būstān Kitāb. [In Persian]
Nīshābūrī, M. (2020). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (Vol. 1, Kh. Ayubi-Nia, Trans.). Tehran: Hosseini Asl Publishing Center. [In Arabic]
Nūrī, Ḥ. (1987). Mustadrak al-wasāʾil wa-mustanbat al-masā’il (Vol. 11, Āl al-Bayt Institute for the Revival of Heritage, Ed.). Qom: Āl al-Bayt Institute. [In Arabic]
Shahīd al-Thānī, Z. (1993). Masālik al-afhām (Vol. 1). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmiyya. [In Arabic]
Shahīd al-Thānī, Z. (1998). Sharḥ al-lumʿa (Vol. 1, A. Shirvani & M. M. Abbasi Zanjani, Trans.). Qom: Dār al-ʿIlm. [In Arabic]
Ṭabarī, M. (1990). Tārīkh al-rusul w-l-mulūk (Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk) (Vol. 3). Beirut: Dār al-Turāth. [In Arabic]
Turner, B. S. (1986). Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate over Reformism. London: Allen & Unwin. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 111 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 252 |
||