آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,555 |
| تعداد مقالات | 36,202 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,278,910 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,361,077 |
The Development of the Application of Independent Reason in Shia Political Jurisprudence | ||
| Islamic Political Studies | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 27 آبان 1404 اصل مقاله (655.77 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/jips.2025.78795 | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 27 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آبان 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Can the non-certain judgment of independent reason be considered valid in deriving juridical rulings in the realm of political jurisprudence? This article, employing an analytical-critical method and relying on library-based sources, seeks to address this question. Imami scholars of Uṣūl al-Fiqh maintain that the judgment of reason is valid only if it is certain and free from any possibility of error. This condition is supported by arguments citing the inherent validity of certainty, the inability of reason to fully comprehend the rationales behind religious rulings, and certain hadiths. However, this condition appears to leave no room for independent reason in political jurisprudence, reducing it to a text-only approach akin to individual and devotional jurisprudence. This trend, by disregarding the benefits and harms that reason discerns behind political and social behaviors, leads to the inefficiency of political jurisprudence and the governance system derived from it. Furthermore, the inability of reason to fully comprehend all benefits and harms in political and social contexts does not necessarily negate the validity of its judgments. The hadiths cited do not explicitly deny reason’s validity, and, conversely, textual sources supporting the validity of reason are not reasonably dismissible. Reason itself, in political and social rulings, deems its findings valid even if there is a slight possibility of error. Moreover, numerous religious texts affirming the validity of reason are absolute with respect to the condition of certainty, and rational judgments in political and social matters represent the paradigmatic example of the general meaning of reason in these texts. It appears that the judgment of independent reason in political and social rulings holds validity based on the threshold of reliability in the practice of rational beings, even if it does not lead to philosophical certainty and is issued in specific details. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Independent reason؛ conjectural reason؛ political jurisprudence؛ benefits and harms | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1 |
||