آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 54 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,646 |
| تعداد مقالات | 37,412 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,997,765 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,650,420 |
الإمام الحسين(ع) وارث هداية النبي(ص): تحليل خطابي - سيميولوجي لزيارة «وارث» | ||
| الفکر السیاسي الاسلامي | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 10، فروردین 2025، صفحه 272-306 اصل مقاله (1.64 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22081/ipt.2026.74760.1066 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| حسین رجائی راد* | ||
| ماجستير في علوم الاتصال، جامعة العلامة الطباطبائي، طهران، إیران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 اردیبهشت 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 29 اردیبهشت 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تغطي الدراسات الثقافية والاتصال نطاقًا واسعًا من الموضوعات المتعددة التخصصات. الدين والثقافة والاتصال من بين هذه الموضوعات البحثية. يعد تحليل النصوص الدينية مثل القرآن والروايات وزيارات أهل البيت(ع) أحد مجالات البحث في الدراسات الدينية. الأسئلة الرئيسية للبحث هي: 1. هل يمكن قراءة زيارة "وارث" للإمام الحسين× بالتحليل السيميولوجي وإلى جانب النصوص الدينية الأخرى مثل القرآن، ضمن بنية دلالية؟ 2. هل تحمل بعض مفاهيم وعبارات زيارة "وارث" معنى ضمنيًا ووظيفة أسطورية لعرض وراثة الإمام الحسين لهداية النبي الأکرم(ص)؟ 3. هل تستطيع عبارات زيارة "وارث" خلق خطاب في عرض تسلسل لا نهائي للصراع بين الحق والباطل؟ تتناول هذه الدراسة، بالمنهج الوصفي-التحليلي وبأخذ عينات هادفة، تحليل عبارات من زيارة "وارث" للإمام الحسين(ع). الإطار النظري لهذا التحليل يشمل الأسس القرآنية لزيارة "وارث" من منظور «محسن قرائتي» و«مجلسي كوباني»، ورؤية «الإمام موسى الصدر» حول الصراع الدائم بين الحق والباطل، ورؤى حول الميراث المادي والمعنوي. كما تم استخدام نظرية البنيوية، والمنهج السيميولوجي لـ«سوسور»، ومنهج الأسطورية (الميثولوجيا) لـ«رولان بارت»، ومفهوم الخطاب عند «فوكو» لإجراء التحليل. تظهر نتائج البحث أن: 1. زيارة "وارث" لها أسس قرآنية ويمكن تحليلها سيميولوجيًا. 2. استخدام الثنائيات الأسطورية في هذه الزيارة يمنح قيام الإمام الحسين(ع) بُعدًا أزليًا وأبديًا. 3. تؤسس زيارة "وارث"، عبر خلق ثنائيات متضادة، خطابًا دينيًا لأتباع الدين يُظهر الإمام الحسين كامتداد لدين النبي. 4. يُفهم مفهوم الوراثة في هذا النص، ليس بمعنى التملك المادي، بل بوصفه وارثًا للمفاهيم وأهداف الكتب السماوية ومنزلة الأنبياء وفضائلهم، وبناءً على ذلك يُعتبر الإمام الحسين(ع) وارثًا لهداية النبي(ص). | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| القرآن؛ الإمام الحسين(ع)؛ زيارة وارث؛ السيميولوجيا وعلم الأسطورة؛ البنيوية والخطاب | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Imam Husayn (AS) as the Heir of the Prophet’s (PBUH) Guidance; A Discourse-Semiological Analysis of the Ziyarat “Warith” | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hussein Rajaei Rad | ||
| Master’s degree in Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study belongs to the interdisciplinary field of cultural studies and communication, and aims to analyze religious discourse from a semiological-mythological perspective based on the theoretical propositions of structuralism, Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiology, Roland Barthes’ mythology, and Michel Foucault’s concept of discourse. Its central text is the Ziyarat “Warith” dedicated to Imam Husayn (AS), regarded as a Shi‘i devotional text that addresses the Imam as the heir of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The study begins from key questions: Can the Ziyarat “Warith” be read within a semantic structure through semiological analysis and alongside other religious texts such as the Qur’an? Do the phrases of the ziyarat carry implicit meanings and mythic functions in presenting Imam Husayn’s (AS) inheritance of the Prophet’s (PBUH) guidance? And can these expressions construct a discourse that establishes the eternal struggle between truth and falsehood? The importance of the research lies in the fact that it offers an unprecedented approach; according to the researcher’s review, no semiological-mythological study of Ziyarat “Warith” had previously been conducted, while earlier works had focused on interpretation, explanation, or the derivation of Qur’anic foundations. The research adopted a descriptive-analytical method, using purposive samples of phrases from the ziyarat that possess prominent rhetorical and metaphorical dimensions and are suitable for semiological analysis. Three operational frameworks were employed: first, Saussure’s mechanism of the horizontal axis (association/opposition) and vertical axis (substitution), whereby the linguistic signifiers of the ziyarat were placed alongside signifiers from the Qur’an and narrations in order to understand meaning through differential and oppositional relations. Second, Roland Barthes’ model of the progression of signification from the direct level (denotation) to the implicit level (cultural-symbolic) and then to the mythic level, which carries major cultural concepts and makes them appear natural and self-evident. Third, Foucault’s concept of discourse, which views discourse as a semantic system that organizes meanings through binary divisions (good/evil, truth/falsehood, light/darkness) and grants legitimacy to some meanings while marginalizing others. The theoretical framework was based on three axes: the concept of material and spiritual inheritance; the Qur’anic foundations of Ziyarat “Warith” as presented by Mohsen Qara’ati and Jalmasi Kubani through comparing the sections of the ziyarat with Qur’anic verses; and the view of Imam Musa al-Sadr regarding the permanent struggle between truth and falsehood and the removal of the event of Ashura from its merely temporal framework. The study revealed a set of interrelated findings: Qur’anic foundations of inheritance and the mechanism of meaning generation: Semiological analysis, by placing the phrases of the ziyarat in a horizontal relation with Qur’anic verses, showed that the title “Warith” is not to be understood in its literal material sense (ownership of the objects, books, or material belongings of the prophets), but rather as inheritance of concepts, stations, virtues, and aims. The description of Imam Husayn (AS) as “the heir of Adam, the chosen one of God” corresponded to the verse of divine vicegerency (al-Baqarah 2:30), the verse of teaching the names (al-Baqarah 2:31), and the inheritance of the spirit breathed into man (Sad 38:72), while the description of him as “the heir of Noah, the Prophet of God” corresponded to his being the “Ark of Salvation” as narrated from him, thereby producing the meaning of inheriting the divine station of deliverance from the flood of ignorance and misguidance. Similarly, the inheritance from Abraham, the Friend of God, was matched with the verse of seeking inner reassurance (al-Baqarah 2:260), the verse of certainty (al-An‘am 6:75), and the phrase of the ziyarat “until certainty came to you,” forming the meaning of inheriting the station of tranquility and certainty. Likewise, the inheritance from Moses, the interlocutor of God, corresponded to the verse describing his departure fearfully and watchfully from the wrongdoers (al-Qasas 28:21), producing the meaning of inheriting the struggle against injustice; and the inheritance from Jesus, the Spirit of God, corresponded to the verse about his seeking aid from the disciples (al-Saff 61:14), which parallels Husayn’s cry on the Day of Ashura: “Is there anyone to help me?” thus forming the meaning of inheriting the mission of guiding humanity through call and divine support. Thus, inheritance became the continuation of the prophets’ path in guiding people from darkness into light. The mythic function of oppositional binaries: The ziyarat uses mythic binaries (light/darkness, purity/impurity, truth/falsehood, peace/curse) that grant Imam Husayn’s (AS) uprising an eternal and timeless dimension beyond the year 61 AH. The phrase “the ignorance of Jahiliyya did not soil you with its impurity” acquires its meaning through its contrast with “a light in the lofty loins,” whereby impurity shifts from a material sense to an abstract concept opposed to guiding light associated with pure, elevated lineages, creating a myth of eternal purity connected to the chain of prophets. Similarly, the word “light” moves from its explicit meaning (illumination) to an implicit meaning of guidance and direction, thereby performing a mythic function in expressing the summit of spiritual felicity. The phrase “the avenger of God” is read implicitly as the offering of the heart’s very essence and the last drop of blood in the path of God. This is also evoked by other expressions such as in Ziyarat al-Arba‘in: “and he gave his innermost soul for You,” thereby becoming a signifier of the sublimity of the person, such that none can avenge him except God. Creation of a religious and exclusionary discourse: The discourse analysis showed that the phrases of cursing directed at “the community that killed you,” “the community that wronged you,” and “the community that heard of this and approved of it” do not refer to specific groups in a temporal or geographical sense. Rather, they remove the word “community” from its historical denotation and give it a broad, non-temporal meaning: any group that stands in the camp of evil, oppression, and approval of injustice. In the differential relation, those who walk the path of Husayn (AS) belong to the camp of good and truth. This binary division (followers of truth / followers of falsehood) creates a discourse that organizes meaningful religious speech about devotion and disavowal, granting legitimacy to the meanings of goodness and purity while marginalizing the meanings of evil and impurity. This discourse is further supported by the enduring formulas of disavowal found in the narrated ziyarat texts (“until the Day of Resurrection,” “forever so long as I live and so long as night and day remain”), which extend the struggle from pre-eternity to forever and present Imam Husayn (AS) as the continuation of the religion of the Prophet (PBUH). The research concluded that Ziyarat “Warith” is a cultural text eminently amenable to semiological analysis. By placing its linguistic signs alongside the Qur’an and narrations along the axes of syntagmatic combination and paradigmatic substitution, a semantic structure emerges showing that Imam Husayn (AS) is the heir of the Prophet’s (PBUH) guidance—not in the sense of material ownership, but through inheriting the stations, aims, virtues, and knowledge of the prophets. Using mythic binaries, the ziyarat produces a religious discourse that divides meanings and practices into good and evil, purity and impurity, light and darkness; it excludes falsehood and confers legitimacy on truth. This discourse gives the event of Ashura an eternal and timeless character, making it present in the collective unconscious of followers across the ages, and establishes Imam Husayn (AS) as the continuation of the Prophet’s religion and the heir to the prophetic path in the enduring struggle between truth and falsehood. In this way, on its mythic level, the ziyarat functions as a mechanism for producing religiosity and shaping sectarian identity through discursive structures that ensure its continuity. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Al-Qur'an, Imam al-Hussein, visitation of heirs, semiology and the science of mythology, al-Baniwiyyah and speech | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
* القرآن الکریم
آسابرگر، آرتور. (1398ش). تحلیل گفتمان کاربردی (مترجم: حسين پاينده). تهران: انتشارات مرواريد.
پاينده، حسين. (1397ش). نظریه و نقد ادبی : درسنامه ای میان رشته ای (ج2). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
چندلر، دانيال. (1397ش). مبانی نشانه شناسی (مترجم: مهدی پارسا). تهران: سوره مهر.
حبيبی، غلام حسين. (1393ش). بينش روششناختی (تحقيق در علوم اجتماعی پارادايمها روشها و تكنيكها). تهران: انتشارات کتاب همه.
حسینی اصفهانی، مرتضی. (1380ش). تفسیر زیارت وارث. قم: انتشارات فرهنگ قرآن.
رجائی راد، حسين؛ كياء، علی اصغر. (14٠4ش «الف»). سریال های عامه پسند، سازوبرگ ایدئولوژیک حاکمیت؛ نشانه شناسی دینداری در سریال تلویزیونی «دودکش 1». مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، 21(81). DOI: 10.22034/jcsc.2025.2040744.2770
رجائی راد، حسين؛ كياء، علی اصغر. (14٠4ش «ب»). صنعت مذهب سازی؛ تحلیل نشانه شناختی نحوه بازنمایی ابعاد دینداری در سریال عامهپسند تلویزیونی «پایتخت 3». مطالعات فرهنگ-ارتباطات، 26(71)، صص 241-289.
رجائی راد، حسين؛ كياء، علی اصغر. (14٠3ش). سوژه شدگی در قلمرو گفتمان دین؛ نشانه شناسی دینداری در سریال تلویزیونی «نون خ1». رسانه های دیداری و شنیداری18(52)، صص 147-182.
صدر، سید موسی. (1391ش). الحسین× وارث الأنبیاء (مترجم: مهدی فخریان، چاپ سوم). تهران: سازمان فرهنگی هنری شهرداری تهران، موسسه نشر شهر.
صدر، سید موسی. (1392ش). شرح فرازهایی از زیارت وارث در کلام امام موسی صدر. پایگاه اطلاع رسانی حوزه. قابل دسترس در:
https://hawzah.net/fa/Article/View/93455
(تاریخ مراجعه: 24/04/1403ش).
الطوسي، أبو جعفر محمد بن حسن. (1411هـ). مصباح المتهجّد وسلاح المتعبّد (ج2). بيروت: مؤسسة فقه الشيعة.
قرائتی، محسن. (1386ش). نگاهی به زیارت وارث. پورتال تبیان. قابل دسترس در: https://article.tebyan.net/62542 (تاریخ مراجعه: 23/04/1403ش).
الكليني، محمد بن یعقوب. (1407ق). الكافي (ج1، الطبعة الرابعة). طهران: دار الكتب الإسلامية.
مجلسی كوبانی، غلامحسين. (1397ش). امام حسين× وارث انبياء، شرحی بر سلام های زیارت وارث. قم: نشر مؤلف.
المفيد، محمد بن محمد بن نعمان. (1413هـ). المزار. المحقِّق والمصحِّح: السيد محمد باقر الأبطحي، قم: المؤتمر العالمي لألفية الشيخ المفيد.
المصطفوي، حسن. (1402هـ). التحقيق في كلمات القرآن الكريم (ج13). طهران: مركز الكتاب للترجمة و النشر.
مهدی زاده، سيد محمد. (14٠٠ش). نظریههای رسانه اندیشههای رایج و دیدگاههای انتقادی. تهران: انتشارات همشهری.
الموسوي، السيد علي. (14٠1ش). المستندات القرآنية والروائية لزيارة وارث (تحت إشراف: علي كريم بور قراملكي). رسالة الماجستير. جامعة المصطفى| العالمية، مجتمع عالی قرآن و حدیث، گروه علمی علوم حدیث.
هومر، شون. (1388ش). ژاک لاكان (مترجم: محمد علی جعفری وسيد محمد ابراهيم طائحی). تهران: ققنوس.
Bignell, Jonathan (1997). Media Semiotics: An Introduction. Manchester. Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage. Kidd, Jenny (2016). Representaion. New York: Routledge. Laughey, D. (2007). Key Themes in Media Theory. McGraw Hill publications. Mansfield, N. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the self from. Allen & Unwin. Mills, s. (2004). Discourse. London and New York : Routledge. Saussure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. Edited by Perry Meisel and Haun Saussy. In Columbia University Press, New York. Saussure, F. (2013). Course in General Linguistics. Translated and annotated by roy harris. In Bloomsbury Academic. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. In Routledge. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 63 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 60 |
||